We live in an age where artists are paid millions of dollars to create work that is not only beautiful but also entertaining. That is probably why the best of the best of them have created works that appeal to you.
It’s not just the top of the best and the best of the rest that are so good, you need to be able to relate to these works. Because it’s not just the work that’s good, it’s the artist that is so good. I mean, even the work that is really good has a certain style that you can appreciate but you also can relate to. It’s like a painting that you don’t just view, you can also understand.
Yes this is true, the best of the best are so good because their works are so good. But the best of the rest are the ones that are not so good, they are what you would call’middling’ works. They are works that you can appreciate and relate to but also understand. Sometimes art can be so hard to relate to because there isn’t a clear or specific reason why the work is good but you can still understand why it is good.
The works of so many artists are so good that its hard to say what is and isn’t good. But in this case I would say that the art is not so great. Although it is good, in the sense that its works of art. But the art, unlike the paintings, is more like a person with character on the canvas that just happens to live in a different world and not actually experiencing what happens in the painting.
I think the artist should be credited for putting in enough effort into what is a difficult to look at piece of art. And when the artist is the one that has put in the effort… well then, I think the art is probably not worth anything.
But we can’t blame the artist for the lack of beauty of the piece of art. If we look at it like the person with the painting is a person (or a person with a painting) that has already seen what is happening in the piece of art, then the artist has actually already painted what is happening.
I think this is a very good way to put it. There are so many layers of the painting. It’s not about the artist. It’s a piece of art that the artist put in the canvas. The person that has seen the work in front of them, has seen what they saw and has the experience of the piece of art. The person that doesn’t know what is going on behind the painting doesn’t have that experience.
This is a good point. I think that when people are just looking at the painting, they don’t really know what is going on, it’s not that they don’t care, its just that they don’t think about it the same way that the person who has seen the painting thinks about it.
The same could be said about how we view the world, and it might just be that we dont actually care about what happens to the world. We all have our own stories about how we see the world and how we experience it.
Well, there is a difference between watching a painting and actually experiencing the painting. The painting is very real, and you have to understand what you are watching and what you are seeing because it has to affect you. But that does not mean you have to care.